THE DRAVIDIANS OF TODAY, 2002 ARE NOT AFRICANS OF TODAY, BUT THEN "DRAVIDIAN" IS A LINGUISTIC TERM CONCOCTED BY THE BRITISH.

THE "AUSTRALOID" PEOPLES OF INDIA ARE A MIXTURE OF NEGROID OF PROTO-HISTORIC AFRICAN ORIGINS, AND ANOTHER BRANCH OF THE BLACK RACE CALLED "AUSTRALOIDS" WHO ARE ALSO OF PROTO-HISTORIC AFRICAN ORIGINS. BOTH OF THESE GROUPS ARE GENETICALLY IDENTICAL, ACCORDING TO THE LATEST FINDINGS ( SEE "SUDROLOGY" HTTP://DALITSTAN.ORG ) OF THE GENOME PROJECT. IN FACT, THE AUSTRALOID AND NEGROID WERE ONCE THE ONLY PEOPLE ON PLANET EARTH AND THEY WERE SPREAD FROM THE AMERICAS, THROUGHOUT EUROPE, THROUGH INDIA, CHINA, SE ASIA, THROUGH MELANESIA, DOWN TO AUSTRALIA.

WE ARE DEALING HERE WITH A PERIOD BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MONGOLOID OR WHITE RACE. HERE IS WHAT IS REALLY STRANGE. NOT TOO LONG AGO, AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES WERE CALLED "ARCHAIC WHITE" BECAUSE IT WAS THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE WHITES WHO TURNED BLACK.

YET, THIS IS FAR FROM REALITY. THE FACT IS, PEOPLE LIKE THE ABORIGINES AND BUSHMEN AS WELL AS NEGROIDS LIKE AFRICANS EXISTED IN EUROPE AND LEFT THEIR ART, CAVE PAINTINGS AND CARVED FIGURES ALL OVER THE PLACE DATING BACK BEFORE 30,000 YEARS AGO. HENCE, AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES AND MELANESIANS HAVE BLONDE HAIR AND AUSTRALOIDS HAVE STRAIGHT HAIR, BUT THESE ARE CHARACTERISTICS THAT EXISTED LONG BEFORE EITHER THE WHITE OR MONGOLOID RACE CAME INTO BEING. THEREFORE, WHITES CAME FROMO A RACE THAT LOOKED LIKE THE PROTO-HISTORIC AFRICANS, WHO RESEMBLED NEGROIDS, AUSTRALOIDS AND THE PEOPLE FOUND IN TASMANIA CALLED TASMANIAN NEGROIDS. THESE ARE AMONG THE MOST ISOLATED PEOPLE ON EARTH AN WERE SO BEFORE THE EUROPEAN INVASION OF AUSTRALIA.

As far as India is concerned, I tend to take the word of the ORIGINAL INDIANS OF INDIA, WHO ARE FROM THE BLACK TRIBAL, OARAN, VEDDOID AND OTHER COMMUNITIES.

THE TERM "BLACK" AS FAR AS AFRICANS AND BLACK INDIANS ARE CONCERNED IS A TERM THAT HAS HAD POSITIVE CONNOTATIONS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS. THERE WAS NOTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT BLACKNESS IN BLACK INDIAN OR BLACK AFRICAN CULTURE.

THERE IS NO WAY, ANY OF THE VERY DARK, CURLY HAIRED, FLATNOSED, HIGH CHEEKBONED, AFRICAN FEATURED PEOPLE OF SOUTH AND EAST INDIA MISLABELED "DRAVIDIANS" ARE ANYTHING BUT A BRANCH OF THE BLACK RACE.

IT IS LIKE SAYING THE TERM "AMERICAN" DEALS WITH ONE GROUP OR RACE, OR THE TERM "ARYAN" DEALS WITH ONE TYPE OF PEOPLE...THESE TERMS HAVE VARIED MEANINGS ALTHOUGH PEOPLE TEND TO MAKE ONE TYPE OF CONNECTION.

HERE IT IS:

ARYAN = A LINGUISTIC CLASIFICATION

AMERICAN = A NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION

HINDU = A RELIGIOUS CLASSIFICATION

SEMITIC = A REGIONAL/ETHNIC CLASSIFICATION
(CAUCASOID, NEGROID MIXTURE)

NEGROID = A RACIAL CLASSIFICATION

MONGOLOID = A RACIAL CLASSIFICATION

CAUCASOID - A RACIAL CLASSIFICATION

AUSTRALOID = A REGIONAL CLASSIFICATION (A REGIONAL VARIATION OF THE BLACK RACE)

POLYNESIAN = A REGIONAL CLASSIFICATION (NEGROID, MONGOLOID)

MALAY = A REGIONAL CLASSIFICATION (MONGOLOID, AUSTRALOID, NEGROID)

KONG-SAN (A REGIONAL CLASSIFICATION OR VARIATION OF THE BLACK RACE, ALSO KNOWN AS BUSHMEN, ECT.)

AMERICAN INDIAN (A REGIONAL VARIATION OF THE MONGOLOID RACE)

MELANESIAN/PAPUAN (A REGIONAL VARIATION OF THE BLACK RACE)

AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINE (A REGIONAL VARIATION OF THE BLACK RACE)

That's as far as I understand this issue, based on the works of a few geneticists and anthropologists whose works I have studied.

AS FAR AS "RACE" IS CONCERNED, THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO LOOK AT IT:

1. THE OUTWARD APPEARANCE AND RESEMBLANCES WHICH IS WHAT COUNTS, OR

2. GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AND SIMILARITIES.

HOWEVER, AS WAS MADE CLEAR ON THE "EVE" PROGRAM, A TINY GROUP OF AFRICANS COMING FROM ONE AREA WITH ONE TYPE OF GENES LEFT THE CONTINENT ABOUT 150,000 YEARS AGO AND SPREAD WORLDWIDE. WHAT ABOUT THE AFRICANS WHO STAYED ON THE CONTINENT. WELL, TODAY, THEY HAVE THE GREATEST VARIATIONS IN GENE TYPES COMBIMED, COMPARED TO ALL THE REST OF THE WORLD.

WHAT THAT TELLS ME IS THAT IF THERE ARE 100 VARIATIONS OF GENES IN AFRICA AND ABOUT TWO LEFT, THEN ONLY THE TWO TYPES SPREAD ALL AROUND THE WORLD, LEAVING THE REST IN AFRICA. HENCE ONE CAN TAKE ANY GROUP OF AFRICANS FROM A PART OF THE CONTINENT WHERE NO ONE LEFT AND THEIR GENES MAY NOT BE THE SAME AS AFRICOID PEOPLE IN A PLACE LIKE FIJI.

HOWEVER, IF YOU TAKE THE GROUP OF AFRICANS (WHO LIVE IN TANZANIA TODAY) THAT THE FIJIANS ARE RELATED TO, YOU WILL FIND THEIR GENETIC MAKEUP TO BE IDENTICAL.

SO THE IDEA THAT HE AUSTRALOIDS ARE NOT OF PROTO-AFRICAN ORIGINS NEEDS TO BE REEXAMINED. FURTHERMORE, IT DEPENDS ON WHICH GROUP OF PEOPLE IN INDIA OR AUSTRALIA YOU SPEAK TO. THOSE BRAINWASHED BY ARYAN AND BRITISH RACISM MAY NOT KNOW THE TRUTH, BUT THOSE WHO KNOW IT WILL PROUDLY CLAIM THEIR AFRICAN ORIGINS. I HAVE SEEN IT AND EXPERIENCED IT IN PERSON, RIGHT IN THE LOS ANGELES AREA WHERE I HAVE MET BOTH BLACK DALITS FROM INDIA AND AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES WHO ARE PROUD TO SAY THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE BLACK AFRICAN DIASPORA.

Nubianem2@webtv.net
http://community.webtv.net/barnubianempire