I'm sorry but I need more clarification. Here's what confuses me. You continue to place whites in Africa prior to 2,000 B.C. You speak of Numidia as being a "Roman Province", suggesting that this was perhaps around 3,000 B.C. or even 7,000 B.C. Well, here's a website about Ancient Rome, a Timeline: (http://www.exovedate.com/ancient_timeline_one.html) It clearly states that Rome didn't even exist in 2,000 B.C., not even in 1,000 B.C. About 1,000 B.C. is states "A sedentary people who inhabited the Italian Peninsula prior to the Romans. They are often described as a mysterious people, as our sources for them are scarce. Many questions remain to be answered regarding the Etruscan culture, its origins, and its relation to the beginnings of Rome."

So, what is the truth? As for the Greeks, their origin is so muttled one dares to suggest a date. The first dating of Greek civilization is typically related to the emergence of philosophers like Solon and Pythagorus. Nothing suggests they existed prior to 2,000 B.C. however.

The real question becomes, why is it so important to whites to place themselves at the root of every great human accomplishment? Why must they perceive themselves as "super human"?