Africa Speaks
Race and HistoryNews and Views
Terms of Service | Translator | Nubian School | Channel Africa | Recommended Books

Articles Archive: Page 1 - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6

Race and History Forum

DR Congo - The Heart of Western Darkness *LINK*

By Asad Ismi 09-09-2011

Genocide and plunder have been Western policy towards the mineral-rich Congo since the Berlin Conference of 1885 when European nations divided Africa between them, and King Leopold II of Belgium got the Congo as his personal property.

Ten million Congolese were killed under Belgian rule which lasted until 1960. The Congo's population was cut in half.

Belgian domination was marked by slavery, forced labour and torture aimed at extracting the maximum amount of ivory and rubber from the Central African country.

The people of the Congo 'probably suffered more than any other colonized group'.

Their hands were cut off for not working hard enough and on one day 1 000 severed hands were delivered in baskets to an official.

Women were kidnapped to force their husbands to collect rubber sap and Congolese were shot for sport.

Such atrocities were documented by George Washington Williams, an African-American visiting the Congo, who invented the term 'crimes against humanity' to describe them.

The US took over the Congo from Belgium in 1960-61 in a bloody coup after the CIA arranged the murder of Patrice Lumumba, the country's first elected leader.

In his place the Agency installed its paid agent Colonel Mobutu Sese Seko who continued the looting and killing started by Leopold, for another 37 years.

The US considered the socialist Lumumba to be pro-Soviet and President Eisenhower himself approved his assassination.

The CIA sent Sidney Gottlieb, its top scientist (under the code name 'Joe from Paris'), to the Congo with deadly biological toxins to use on Lumumba.

This particular assassination plot was unsuccessful but Lumumba was killed by Mobutu's troops on January 17, 1961.

Until his ouster in 1997, Mobutu was Africa's most brutal and corrupt ruler who massacred and tortured thousands of people, and plundered his country with US backing.

From 1965 to 1991, Zaire (as Mobutu named the Congo) got more than US$1.5 billion in US economic and military aid.

In return, US multinational corporations increased their share of Zaire's abundant minerals.

Washington justified its hold on the Congo with the pretext of anti-Communism but its real interests were strategic and economic.

The Congo borders nine African states and in terms of mineral wealth it is the richest country in Africa holding the world's biggest copper, cobalt and cadmium deposits.

The Congo contains 80 percent of the world's cobalt (essential for jet aviation, defence and other high-tech production), 10 percent of its copper, and one-third of its diamonds in addition to possessing considerable reserves of gold, uranium and manganese.

Other resources include coltan (used in cellphones, jet engines and fibre optics), timber, oil, coffee, tin, zinc and palm oil.

Former US President George Bush who was Mobutu's friend for 20 years, has interests in mining companies in the Congo.

In addition to getting a share of Congolese wealth, the US used the country as a base to attack the left-wing MPLA government in Angola after it took power in 1975.

According to the World Bank, (a long-time supporter of Mobutu's), 64.7 percent of Zaire's budget was reserved for Mobutu's 'discretionary spending' in 1992.

Official Zairian figures put the number at 95 percent.

Such astounding pillage made Mobutu (according to himself) one of the three richest men in the world while impoverishing Zairians and destroying the country's infrastructure.

One-third of Zaire's citizens died from malnutrition under Mobutu with 'countless others' suffering permanent brain damage in youth.

A Balkanized Congo

Mobutu's unlimited greed was his undoing.

As long as he shared the looting with US, Belgian, French, British, Dutch and other Western corporations which dominated the Zairian economy, the US supported him.

But, as one observer put it, 'when he kept too much for himself - and became an embarrassment - the US was ready to see him overthrown'.

In October 1996, the Rwandan army along with Ugandan troops invaded Zaire and by May 1997 had taken over the country and forced Mobutu to flee.

To give the invasion the cover of a local rebellion, the Tutsi Rwandan forces called themselves the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo-Zaire (ADFL) and recruited Laurent Kabila, an exiled Congolese Marxist opponent of Mobutu's, as a figurehead leader.

As the Wall Street Journal put it, 'Many Africans (concluded that) the Zairian rebellion was the brainchild of Washington from the very start.'
Rwanda and Uganda are the US' 'staunchest allies in the region'.

Paul Kagame, the Rwandan leader, was trained at the US Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

US Special Forces had been training the Rwandan army since 1994 in counterinsurgency, combat and psychological operations.

This included instructions about fighting in Zaire. Rwandan soldiers were also trained at Fort Bragg, North Carolina (US), in July-August 1996 (just before the invasion), in land navigation, rifle marksmanship, patrolling and small-unit leadership.

Also in August 1996, Kagame visited Washington to discuss his concerns about Hutu refugee camps in eastern Zaire with US officials.

The Hutus are the majority ethnic group in Rwanda (85 percent) while Tutsis make up the minority (15 percent).

In April 1994, the Hutu government had unleashed a genocide that killed 800 000 Tutsis and 50 000 Hutus in 89 days.

Kagame's Tutsi rebel force, the Rwanda Patriotic Army (RPA) then invaded Rwanda from Uganda and took power.

A million Hutus fled to eastern Zaire.

Kagame considered the Hutu refugee camps a 'dangerous threat to his regime' because Hutu militia who had carried out the genocide were amongst the civilians.

As one observer put it, 'It was clear to the US ... that Kagame was prepared to act and that this was certainly in the US government's interest.'
Once the Rwandans had installed Kabila in power, his relations with them quickly deteriorated.

In July 1998, Kabila expelled Rwandan and Ugandan forces from the Congo.

He cited as his reasons a failed assassination attempt against him and the Rwandan army's killings of Hutu refugees.

On August 2, Rwanda and Uganda invaded the Congo and occupied its eastern half where they … set up surrogate 'rebel' armies called Congolese Rally for Democracy (RCD-Goma-created by Rwanda) and Movement for the Liberation of the Congo (MLC-created by Uganda).

Angola, Zimbabwe and Namibia sent their armies to support Kabila and Burundi joined the Rwandans and Ugandans.

Thus began 'Africa's First World War' involving seven armies, which killed 2.5 million people and further devastated a country crushed by more than a century of Western domination.

This domination is being continued through Washington's use of Rwanda and Uganda to partition the Congo and loot its resources.
The US backed the Rwandan/Ugandan invasion of the Congo and according to Human Rights Watch apparently justified it.

The Washington Post reported that US soldiers were sighted in the company of Rwandan troops in the Congo on July 23 and 24, 1998.
At the start of hostilities, the US reacted with 'a remarkable silence'.

When a statement was issued it explained that the invasion was intended to counter genocide and blamed the Congolese government for failing to deal with border security.

Susan Rice, US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, told Congress that the US 'fully understands their (Rwanda and Uganda's) legitimate security interests in countering insurgent attacks from Congolese soil'.

Rice added that foreign intervention in the Congo was 'unacceptable' but Washington declined to call for the immediate withdrawal of its close allies, the Rwandan and Ugandan forces, which it has trained, armed and financed.

If foreign intervention really was unacceptable, the US could have ended it by cutting off its considerable military and economic support for Rwanda and Uganda and sanctioning the countries.

Instead, Rice pressed for a ceasefire in place and pressured Kabila into signing the Lusaka Accord which treated the conflict as a civil war and called for a step-by-step withdrawal of foreign troops (in 180 days) rather than an immediate one…

Kabila accepted the Lusaka Accord only because of the implicit US threat that 'refusal would be met by even greater assistance to the rebels and the potential dismantling of the entire country'. This message was dramatically reinforced on January 17, 2001 when Laurent Kabila himself was assassinated on the same day that Lumumba had been, 40 years earlier.

Joseph Kabila, Laurent's son, took over as President.

Thus the US has ensured continued Western dominance of the Congo by destroying the country itself as it existed when Mobutu was overthrown.

Just as in the Berlin Conference of 1885, the West is again redrawing the Congo's boundaries and this process is once more accompanied by plunder and large-scale killing.

Armies of Business

According to a UN report released in April 2001, Rwanda and Uganda are looting and plundering the resources of the eastern Congo and illegally exporting them to the West.

The eastern Congo contains most of the country's minerals.

The report titled 'Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the Democratic Republic of the Congo' details 'mass-scale looting' and extraction carried out by Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi in the occupied zones between September 1998 and August 1999.

During this time, the eastern Congo was 'drained of existing stockpiles, including minerals, agricultural and forest products and livestock'.

Rwandan, Ugandan and Burundian soldiers visited banks, factories, farms and storage facilities to remove their contents and load them into vehicles.

In November 1998, the Rwandan army transported seven years worth of coltan stock (about 1 500 tons) to Kigali (Rwanda's capital).

Following the looting of stockpiles, Rwanda and Uganda have been extracting diamonds, gold, coltan, timber and coffee from the eastern Congo and illegally exporting these to the West.

Rwanda made US$250 million in 18 months from coltan exports alone.

According to the 'Christian Science Monitor,' every day cargo flights full of diamonds, gold and palm oil left the Congo for Kigali and Kampala (Uganda's capital).

Seven to ten such daily flights come into Kigali. Most of their cargo was loaded on to planes bound for Europe.

Diamond exports from Rwanda and Uganda to the West surged since 1998 yet neither country has any diamond mines.

During 1999-2000, Uganda exported US$3m worth of diamonds. Diamond dealers in the Congo provide US$2m a year to the Rwandan army.

The looting and extraction of resources has been accompanied by the 'constitution of criminal cartels' in occupied areas, created or protected by top military commanders.

The UN report blamed Presidents Kagame and Museveni (of Uganda) for 'indirectly' giving 'criminal cartels a unique opportunity to organize and operate in this fragile and sensitive area'.

The document warned that these cartels which have 'ramifications and connections worldwide...represent the next serious security problem in the region'.

Significantly, the UN report pointed out that the illegal exploitation of the eastern Congo had been abetted by Western companies, governments, multilateral institutions and diplomats.

Rwanda's coltan exports were transported by Sabena, the Belgian national airline, while Citibank carried out the required financial transactions.

Ramnik Kotecha, the US Honorary Consul in the eastern Congo, promoted deals between Rwandan coltan sellers and US companies.

Kotecha himself also dealt in coltan.

Uncertified timber from occupied Congo was imported by companies in Belgium, Denmark, Japan, Switzerland and the US.

Western governments rewarded Rwanda for invading the Congo by doubling aid to the country from US$26.1 million in 1997 to US$51.5 million in 1999.

The US, Britain, Denmark and Germany were the bilateral donors. Rwanda could thus spend more money on the war.

Rewards were promoted for Rwanda and Uganda by the World Bank too, which praised the latter's economic performance following its Congolese diamond and gold exports.

The Bank pushed the case of both countries for the Highly Indebted Poor Countries initiative (a debt relief programme) and dismissed the fact that Uganda's improved economic statistics stemmed from its illegal exploitation of the Congo.

The UN report also listed 35 companies illegally importing minerals from the eastern Congo through Rwanda but does not give the national origin of these companies.

Instead, the report specifies the destination of the material.

Twenty-six of the companies' destinations were in the West. The firms included Cogem, Transintra, Issa, Finconcorde, Cogecom, Tradement, MDW, Sogem, Soger, Cogea, Finiming, Cicle, Eagleswing, Union-Transport and Banro Resources, a Canadian company.

Ten of the 35 companies are importing coltan to Belgium; three are importing the same resource to the Netherlands, three to Germany, two to Britain and one to Switzerland.

Along with plundering the eastern Congo, Rwanda and Uganda committed 'devastating human rights abuses' according to Human Rights Watch (HRW).

The Rwandan army and RCD Goma 'have regularly slaughtered civilians in massacres and extrajudicial executions' as well as tortured and raped villagers.

As Alison Des Forges of HRW put it in April 2001, 'While Ugandan commanders were plundering gold, looting timber, exporting coffee and controlling illicit trade monopolies in the Ituri district, their troops were killing and otherwise abusing the local population.'

Uganda's encouragement of (and participation in) fighting between the Hema and Lendu ethnic groups resulted in 7 400 deaths.

Human rights violations were widespread on the Congolese government side as well, including 'indiscriminate attacks on civilians, extrajudicial executions (and) rape'.

Kabila's allies Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia also profited from the war. However, the Kabila regime cannot be accused of being a foreign military occupier; nor did it initiate the war.

Canadian Companies

Also benefiting from the war were ten Canadian mining companies with investments in the Congo.
These were: Barrick Gold, American Mineral Fields (AMF), Tenke Mining, Banro Resource, Consolidated Trillion, First Quantum Minerals, International Panorama Resource, Melkior Resources, Samax Gold and Starpoint Goldfields.

These companies were awarded valuable concessions in mining copper, cobalt, gold, platinum and zinc deposits.

Even before Laurent Kabila came to power he had signed deals with AMF and Tenke Mining.

In March 1997, Jean Raymond Boulle, founder of AMF, signed a US$1b agreement with Kabila's rebel army to develop a zinc mine at Kipushi, and a cobalt venture in Kolwezi; Boulle also received approval to sell diamonds in Shaba Province.

As part of these arrangements, Boulle lent Kabila a leased jet.

In early 1997, Kabila sent a representative to Toronto to speak to mining companies about 'investment opportunities'.

According to Dale Grant, editor of 'Defence Policy Review,' this trip 'may have raised as much as US$50 million to support Kabila's march on the capital of Kinshasa'.

On May 12, 1997 Tenke Mining announced that it had signed a deal with Kabila confirming the terms of a contract the company had previously signed with Mobutu's government in November 1996.

At this point, Kabila had not yet taken power.

The urgent need to finance the war compelled the Congo government to reach quick agreements with mining companies over exploration rights.

The companies thus gained resources for less than they would in peace conditions.

According to the 'Christian Science Monitor,' Laurent Kabila 'adopted a circle of Canadian advisors'.

Part of this 'Congo inner circle' was Joe Clark, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party and former Canadian Prime Minister and Foreign Minister.

In the mid-1990s, Clark became First Quantum Mineral's special advisor on Africa. He stated: 'The government of Congo knows that if it's going to make progress quickly in terms of using assets that create jobs, mining is more likely to do it than other sectors.'

Barrick Gold and Banro held mining properties in eastern Congo under Rwandan/Ugandan control.

Banro had 47 mining concessions in Sud Kivu and Maniema provinces while Barrick got exploration and exploitation rights to 'a huge tract of land' (82 000 square km) in Orientale Province.

As reported in 'Le Monde Diplomatique,' Barrick and Banro were accused of 'funding military operations in exchange for lucrative contracts'.

Banro was also included in the UN list of companies involved in the illegal exploitation of the eastern Congo.

The company imported cassiterites (tin ores) from the rebel area into Canada.

Heart of Darkness

The destruction of the Congo says much more about the West than it does about the Central African country.

It reveals most clearly that the West is largely a criminal enterprise, the prosperity of which is based on the genocide of Third World people and the theft of their resources.

The Congo is perhaps the worst example of this but the West has followed the same policy in Asia, Africa and Latin America for centuries.

In this sense, Western countries can be seen as a murderous mafia led by their godfather the United States government for which no amount of blood and wealth is enough.

The perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide are being … It is time to try those responsible in the US and Belgium as well for more than a century of genocide and plunder in the Congo.

And that will just be the beginning of dealing with the West's horrendous crimes. - Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Monitor • This article is dedicated to Patrice Lumumba.

Messages In This Thread

DR Congo - The Heart of Western Darkness *LINK*
Re: DR Congo - The Heart of Western Darkness
Terrorism and Westo-American governments

Trinicenter Int. | Africa News Links | 9/11 Home | Latest News | Sources | Search | Homepage

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. is a 100% non-profit Website.