MANY BLACKS IN ASIA ARE PROUD TO BE BLACK AND ARE TREATED AS BLACKS BY ASIANS, MALAYS, BRITISH AND OTHERS

Treated as black does not mean they are! They are different races from Africans and genetically the furthest apart.

There are Blacks from Africa, India, Melanesia, Australia, the Caribbean, Europe, the Americas, Arabia an other places who view as well as conribute to this site.

Doesn't make them Negroids.

As far as Blacks in New Guinea, Papua and Melanesia is concerned....THE FACT IS, ASIANS GOT THEIR GENES FROM THESE BLACKS, AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

No. They couldn't be more further genetically than a South east Asian or black African!

THESE BLACKS ARE THE ORIGINAL AND ABORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF ALL ASIA, AND THE FAIR-SKINNED FOLK WHO CHANGED IN THE NORTHERN PARTS OF ASIA, MIXE WITH SOME OF THE ABORIGINAL BLACKS TO PRODUCE PEOPLE LIKE THE MALAYS, THE POLYNESIANS AND OTHERS.

You're talking about Mongoloids and Australoids. They are separate races from black Africans!

Even the Ainu of Japan is said by some to be of the same racial type of Australian Aborigines, a prehistoric people who originated in Africa called the Anu, who were Black and who still have related tribes such as the Anuak, Tibbou and others in parts of Africa toay.

The Ainu? You have lost it! The Ainu you either a proto-caucasoid people or Mongoloid. Nothing to do with Negroids. Yes, they may have started in Africa, but they are not black or Negroid.

let me tell you that the Australian Aborigines and some tribes of Africa todday have good relations and cultural exchanges.

I can believe that. They are socially black and hard to tell apart. Genetics tells a whole other story. Totally unrelated to each other. Same for Capellids and Veddoids.

Secondly, I have spoken to, danced with, bought from and socialize with Blacks from the South Pacific, Australia, Papua New Guinea and Cambodia....Those who have not been brainwashed by the British (as some of the highly mixed in Australia) or by the "Aryan" castes of India, or the Arab Semites or the Malays...THEY ARE EXTREMELY PROUD TO SAY WITH CONFIDENCE THAT THEY ARE AFRICAN IN RACE AND ORIGINS, AND THEIR PREHISTORIC ANCESTORS ORIGINATED IN AFRICA.

No they do not. But what is surprising how you African-Americans can't accpet that you're African in race and origins instead of trying to invent histories in the other corners of the world.

I suggest you visit some of the Pan-African festivals (such as THE AFRICAN MARKETPLACE ANF CULTURAL FAIRE OF LOS ANGELES, A CITY WITH MORE AFRICANS, AND BLACK PACIFIC ISLANDERS THAN ANY WHERE OUTSIDE OF AFRICA AN THE SOUTH PACIFIC) where you will find Blacks from India, S.E. Asia, Australia, the Caribbean, the U.S., Africa, Latin America, Europe, New Guinea and many other places. THEY SURELY DON'T RECOGNIZE THIS IDEA THAT THEY ARE GENETICALLY LINKE TO MONGOLOID ASIANS, WHEN IN FACT, THEY ARE THE PARENTS OF THE MONGOLOID ASIANS WHO ARE THE ONES LINKED TO THEM, JUST AS THEY ARE THE PRODUCT OF AFRICANS WHO MIGRATED TO ASIA IN PREHISTORIC TIMES (AS THE PROGRAM "EVE," CLEARLY INDICATED RECENTLY).

You know, whites are genetically closer to Africans than what Mongoloids are. However, in terms of anthropology, Mongoloids and caucasoids are harder to differentiate.

I don't know, I and tens of millions of Blacks around the world were raised to not trust anyone, especially in the media, and particularly when it comes to the internet, where anyone can claim to be anything.

You're last sentence in that paragraph just sums up your entire agenda.

However, as the saying goes, "truth submerged shall rise again."

Don't you think you should be looking for the truth in Africa and not everywhere else?

When the Aryan-speakers in India are oppressing Black Untouchables, reducing them to cleaning toilets and carrying dead animals and living in sub-human conditions, or even calling them "untouchables," "unseeables," "unthinkables," IT HAS TO DO WITH THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN AND THE FACT THAT THEY ARE THE ORIGINAL BLACK NEGRO-AUSTRALOID PEOPLE, WHO ARE PART OF THE ANCIENT AND PRESENT BLACK RACE.

This is very wrong. There are Hindus of the highest case who are darker than some Dalits. The ancient race in India are related to Australoids and not Negroids.

n fact the system of untouchability and "varna" (color consciouisness) was invented by the white, "wheat colored," barbarians who infiltrated India and mixed with the pure Blacks to create some of the population of Today's India, while huge numbers remain pure Black Negritic in the South an East of the country.

The Siddis are black and from Africa and reside in India. But they are not Tamils or anything else to do with India. India is a proto-Caucasoid people with ancient strains of Australoid and some Mongloid. No Negroid.

Blacks in Papua New Guinea, West Papua, Melanesia, Fiji, Solomon Islands, New Caledonia and Vanuatu were deliberately attacked and carried into slavry by the Malays because these Blacks are Black descendants of Ham who should be enslaved according to the religious beliefs of these Malays, whose religion came from the Middle East, where Black Sudanese and Mauritanians are the victims of this same system of sanctified racism.

Oh and I thought the Middle easterners were black?

In Australia the Aborigines are called "Black Fellows," and some look like Tribal Indians from India

Yes, because Australoids inhabited India.

who are part of the Black race, while others look like any Black person walking on the streets of New York or Lagos.

Very hard to tell an Australoid from an African. Genetically? That's a whole other story.

The British Austrailians, Indonesians and others in the Pacific do not waste their time trying to test their blood to see whether there is "Asian' genes (which) if we believe in MITOCHONDRIAL DNA, IS ORIGINALLY AFRICAN ANYWAY. They see Black people, with Negro features and they have opprssed, enslaved, massacred and destroyed them.

They know the difference. Indonesians are not black either.

So, you see why since the sixties Blacks in places like Australia, East TIMOR, South Pacific, Papua New Guinea, Philipines, India and many parts of Asia have joined with Africans and Blacks in other parts of the world as one people in the fight for freedom.

Yeah, so did the Irish, so did other whites to demand civil rights.

WE ARE ALL BLACK...WE ARE ALL TREATED THE SAME.

No.

IN FACT, BLACKS AROUND THE WORLD ARE MUCH CLOSER IN LANGUAGE, GENETICS, PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AN CUSTOMS THAN ARE AMERICAN INDIANS AND CHINESE, YET BOTH AMERICAN INDIANS AND CHINESE ARE MONGOLOID PEOPLES.

No relations in language or genetics or even customs. Physical appearance of some Aboriginies is deceiving.Don't get excited, still not relation to blacks.

Semitic Arabs and Scandinavians are both Caucasian, although Semitic Arabs have a significant amout of Black and Mongoloid Turkic blood.

Not all Arabs.Some Scandinavians have Mongloid too. Didn't you claim the Turks were black anyway?

Hence, its a good thing Blacks around the world who are enlightened are not going to let people devide, destroy and enslave us any longer by creating false divisions to weaken us.

You have weakened your own agenda by being too extreme. Start with Africa instead of searching everywhere else.

Tell me about the history of the british Ilses and Ireland. I would like to know your views on this.