the same but Huxkley was one of the first people to suggest that whites and Mediterraneans were two different people.
I did say however that they had Caucaisan like features (which would also mean Mediterranean)and that remains true. I have seen countless stautes and depictions of Egyptians, including the famous scribe and you cannot convince me that he or the others were anything but Mediterranean in race (similar to teh ancient Minoans, southern Italians, Portuguese, Greeks etc...)
The nose is straight, the lips are thin, the facial features are smooth and the skin tone on the painted ones is brown. There can be little room for error in view of such evidence
Huxley was also a fervent racist who said i Never met a black man that was intelelctualy equal to blacks.
To call aqualine nose a caucasain feature is off base,because that means you would be calling populations in ethiopian,somalia,and eastern africa as being a mixed stock when they are not.
The fulani of western africa have light skin,and hausa in northern niogeria are classified as hamitic.
Huxley is not a reliable resource. Shomaka keita is a bioanthroplogist and has reftured the racist claims of egyptains being med populations,maybe you should look him up. The man name selgiman sugested the egyptains were hamities just another word for dark whites,and also considered beja of sudan to be the closest to pharoanic phenotype.
I will post anthropologica exerts if you want me to.
Clealy you have not seen my popsting on the sculpture of the egyptains,which even show the egyptains earliest pharoahs with negriod flat nose and thick lips feature.
I know you have seen queen tiye bust who was half hurrian,but her mother tuya mummies'even have proganism,which is anhegriod feature.